As the old saying goes, ‘He who pays the piper calls the tune’. This week, a coalition of economics students, academics and campaigners gathered to get inside the piper-paying process – the funding of economics research – to create an economics fit for the real world.
The ‘piper’ principle plays out for academic research through a process called the Research Excellence Framework (REF), and its impact is considerable. Every five years or so, each higher education institution gets assessed through the REF. Academics submit their published research which is then judged against a set of criteria and graded. The higher it is graded, the more money their department will receive for future research.
Within economics departments the REF encourages academics to focus on a single type of economics, while broader research is sidelined. Work that draws on innovative insights about human behaviour, market failures, gender dynamics, ecological limits and institutions is disregarded, whilst more the mainstream research that sticks to the narrow traditionalist set of assumptions about how the economy works receives the highest grade.
society is burdened with economists who cannot deal with the challenges we face
Because it determines so much of their funding, universities take the REF very seriously. In economics departments, it influences who they hire and fire, which topics they research, and the kind of economics that gets taught to students. Because it dictates the teaching, this cycle is perpetuated. Narrow economic thinking is passed onto the economists of the future, and society is burdened with economists who cannot deal with the challenges we face, from climate change, to inequality, to financial instability and beyond.
Because the REF has such an impact on society, the new coalition REFunding Economics is working to defend the discipline and make sure that diverse, real-world economics gets the funding it deserves.
The bias of the REF derives from several factors, but possibly most crucial is the choice of individuals that sit on the REF panels. They set the criteria for what is classed as ‘world-leading’ research, and they grade the thousands of pieces of submitted work, ultimately deciding if it is ‘high quality’ or not. In the 2014 REF, the economics panel was overwhelmingly made up of experts who subscribe to a narrow view of economics, while more diverse, interdisciplinary economists were left by the wayside.
The REFunding Economics coalition is determined to have a positive impact on the next REF, due to take place in 2021. As a first step, they are working to get top quality diverse economists into the heart of the REF system. The REF organising body, which is connected to the Department for Education, allows organisations to nominate individuals for the sub-panels, although the final choice of panelists is up to them.
“We need to make sure that the REF Economics panel values diverse, real-world economics,” explains Laura Bannister, Strategy Co-ordinator at Rethinking Economics, who are co-ordinating the REFunding coalition. “We’ve been pulling together a group of brilliant economics researchers to put forward, and we sincerely hope that REF will select a good number of them for the panel. This could have a huge positive impact on how economics research gets judged, and will send a strong message to university economics departments about what is wanted from them.”
The deadline for panel nominations is 20th December 2017, so the successful candidates are likely to be announced in the new year.
This will be the first step in a major campaign. The REFunding Economics coalition will be taking every opportunity available in the next few years to influence the REF process for the better. “If we don’t take action, the REF may be a real barrier to reforming economics,” Bannister explains.
Often, the assumptions and models that they are taught seem to be based in a strange alternate reality
Rethinking Economics has grown out of the international student movement for better economics in the classroom and in society.
“Students all over the UK and the world have been sitting in their economics lectures, wondering when they’re going to learn about the big issues: inequality, financial crises, post-growth economics for the climate change age. Often, the assumptions and models that they are taught seem to be based in a strange alternate reality that bears little relation to the real world in which they’ll later be employed. Students, as well as many academics and professional economists, have become increasingly worried about this. The system isn’t creating the kind of economists that the real world needs, and the REF is a big player in this issue.”
By pushing for change in economics research and teaching, and in the mechanisms that fund it, RE hopes to shift the way economics is understood, taught and communicated by governments, universities and other bodies of influence.
“Economics makes the world go round. We need economists that can grapple with the big issues of the 21st century, and this requires a broader subject that can deal with these multidimensional problems. Economics is crucial to everyone’s quality of life, and good economics begins in the classroom, where the decision makers of tomorrow learn their trade. It’s time we made sure that we’re creating an economics that is fit for the future.”
Visit www.rethinkeconomics.org to find out more and to get involved.
Featured image credit: Rethinking Economics
The Norwich Radical is non-profit and run by volunteers. All funds raised help cover the maintenance costs of our website, as well as contributing towards future projects and events. Please consider making a small contribution to fund a better media future.